Has the thought of re-reimbursement come about in senior managements minds? Do they really think that as a college they have provided the students with 'good-value for money'? Would they pay £3000 for the service they have provided? Do they feel like they have given the "highest quality vocational training and education" like they say they provide on the website? I hate to compare to other Universities, but most I know of have seen no drop in contact hours, whereas Bruford's seem to of melted away. Why hasn't the college been flexible enough to address these issues, and alter their ways of creating and delivering content? Speaking on Lighting Design, when the tutor has been unable to deliver the lectures due to personal reasons, why hasn't there been provision for someone to step in been made? This surely wouldn't be the same if we were at Bruford. If it had provisions had been made, this could've increased our contact hours. Again, the changes to the timetable have been pretty dreadful. Lectures have been cancelled a day in advance, and in one case, we were told 5 minutes before the lecture was meant to start that it had been postponed. I can't help feeling mildly annoyed again, that I have payed £3000 for roughly 20 hours of teaching. My main question is: do the college feel they have provided a service that they can pride themselves upon, and feel confident that they have provided an acceptable service that has been worth our money?